<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1587 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281145</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee in a challenge against the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for concealing income particulars. The notice issued before the penalty levy did not specify the limb of Section 271(1)(c), rendering the penalty proceedings invalid. Consequently, the penalty was canceled, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 06:22:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1587 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281145</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee in a challenge against the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for concealing income particulars. The notice issued before the penalty levy did not specify the limb of Section 271(1)(c), rendering the penalty proceedings invalid. Consequently, the penalty was canceled, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>