<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 162 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381085</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming the addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee&#039;s transactions were deemed part of a scheme to provide bogus long-term capital gains. The AO&#039;s decision to withdraw the exemption under section 10(38) and assess the entire sale consideration under section 68 was upheld, with the Tribunal finding no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 10:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 162 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381085</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming the addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee&#039;s transactions were deemed part of a scheme to provide bogus long-term capital gains. The AO&#039;s decision to withdraw the exemption under section 10(38) and assess the entire sale consideration under section 68 was upheld, with the Tribunal finding no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>