<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 156 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381079</link>
    <description>CBDT&#039;s 11.07.2018 litigation policy prescribing a minimum tax-effect threshold for High Court appeals applies retrospectively to pending matters, so a Revenue appeal below that threshold may be withdrawn rather than pursued on merits. Where the disputed tax effect was conceded to be below the prescribed limit, the Court permitted withdrawal of the appeal at the Revenue&#039;s request and treated the matter as dismissed as withdrawn.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 08:25:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 156 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381079</link>
      <description>CBDT&#039;s 11.07.2018 litigation policy prescribing a minimum tax-effect threshold for High Court appeals applies retrospectively to pending matters, so a Revenue appeal below that threshold may be withdrawn rather than pursued on merits. Where the disputed tax effect was conceded to be below the prescribed limit, the Court permitted withdrawal of the appeal at the Revenue&#039;s request and treated the matter as dismissed as withdrawn.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>