<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 145 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381068</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decisions regarding the taxation of investment advisory fees in the assessment year 2010-11, leading to the dismissal of all appeals. It was determined that there was no violation of Rule 46A, no grounds for reopening assessments for the years 2007-08 and 2008-09, and the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was correctly deleted. The income had already been assessed in the relevant year, preventing double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 145 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381068</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decisions regarding the taxation of investment advisory fees in the assessment year 2010-11, leading to the dismissal of all appeals. It was determined that there was no violation of Rule 46A, no grounds for reopening assessments for the years 2007-08 and 2008-09, and the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was correctly deleted. The income had already been assessed in the relevant year, preventing double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>