<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 136 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381059</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order and restoring the company to its original status under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Restoration was deemed justified despite the company not being operational due to pending litigation, as it was considered &#039;otherwise just.&#039; The company was directed to comply with statutory requirements within a specified timeframe to regularize its position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 08:13:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 136 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381059</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order and restoring the company to its original status under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Restoration was deemed justified despite the company not being operational due to pending litigation, as it was considered &#039;otherwise just.&#039; The company was directed to comply with statutory requirements within a specified timeframe to regularize its position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>