<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 125 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381048</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the adjudicating authority erred in quantifying the service tax for miscellaneous reimbursements as the appeal was specific to man power and security services. The order quantifying the service tax for miscellaneous reimbursements was set aside, and the appeal was allowed to this extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 08:10:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 125 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381048</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the adjudicating authority erred in quantifying the service tax for miscellaneous reimbursements as the appeal was specific to man power and security services. The order quantifying the service tax for miscellaneous reimbursements was set aside, and the appeal was allowed to this extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>