<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 102 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18383</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the amount repaid using account payee crossed demand drafts should not be treated as income under section 69D of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It agreed with the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal that account payee demand drafts are equivalent to account payee cheques, leading to the deletion of Rs. 41,175 from the assessment. The court emphasized the importance of transaction transparency and aligned its interpretation with legislative intent to prevent black money proliferation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:59:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 102 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18383</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the amount repaid using account payee crossed demand drafts should not be treated as income under section 69D of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It agreed with the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal that account payee demand drafts are equivalent to account payee cheques, leading to the deletion of Rs. 41,175 from the assessment. The court emphasized the importance of transaction transparency and aligned its interpretation with legislative intent to prevent black money proliferation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>