https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381041 Revisional interference under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 is confined to miscarriage of justice, jurisdictional error, perversity, or findings based on no or inadmissible material, so concurrent findings of fact are ordinarily not disturbed. The tenant failed to prove advance payment, any agreement for adjustment against rent, or tender or deposit of arrears under Section 20(4) of the U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972. The landlord's registered notice, acknowledgment receipt, and oral evidence supported service, and the tenant's bare denial did not rebut the presumption of service. The decree for eviction and arrears was sustained, subject to modification on ancillary liability for house tax and water tax. en-us Fri, 24 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Jun 2019 08:09:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381041 Revisional interference under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 is confined to miscarriage of justice, jurisdictional error, perversity, or findings based on no or inadmissible material, so concurrent findings of fact are ordinarily not disturbed. The tenant failed to prove advance payment, any agreement for adjustment against rent, or tender or deposit of arrears under Section 20(4) of the U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972. The landlord's registered notice, acknowledgment receipt, and oral evidence supported service, and the tenant's bare denial did not rebut the presumption of service. The decree for eviction and arrears was sustained, subject to modification on ancillary liability for house tax and water tax. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381041