https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381039 The court disposed of the writ petition challenging a notice under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 for illegal interception and detention of goods. The court directed the petitioner to submit a bank guarantee for tax and penalty, apply for the release of goods within two days, and instructed the second respondent to release the goods within twelve hours of receiving the guarantee. The respondent was given four weeks to complete the enquiry, pass a fair order, and communicate it to the petitioner, while setting aside the handwritten endorsement on the notice and instructing a proper consideration of the objection in accordance with the law. en-us Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Mar 2025 10:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381039 The court disposed of the writ petition challenging a notice under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 for illegal interception and detention of goods. The court directed the petitioner to submit a bank guarantee for tax and penalty, apply for the release of goods within two days, and instructed the second respondent to release the goods within twelve hours of receiving the guarantee. The respondent was given four weeks to complete the enquiry, pass a fair order, and communicate it to the petitioner, while setting aside the handwritten endorsement on the notice and instructing a proper consideration of the objection in accordance with the law. Case-Laws GST Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381039