https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381038 A delay of 2,386 days in seeking restoration was condoned where the appellant had removed office objections within time and the failure to number and register the appeal lay with the Registry, not the appellant. The court treated the delay as technical because compliance with the conditional order had already been completed, and a party cannot be required to perform an act dependent on the Registry once objections are cured. The notice of motion was therefore made absolute and the appeal restored. en-us Mon, 22 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381038 A delay of 2,386 days in seeking restoration was condoned where the appellant had removed office objections within time and the failure to number and register the appeal lay with the Registry, not the appellant. The court treated the delay as technical because compliance with the conditional order had already been completed, and a party cannot be required to perform an act dependent on the Registry once objections are cured. The notice of motion was therefore made absolute and the appeal restored. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 22 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381038