https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381037 Remand under Customs appellate procedure was treated as permissible where the earlier order had been set aside for want of proper hearing and further adjudication was needed. On the wireless access point issue, the text notes that importability depended on whether WPC permission was required at the relevant time, and that later clarification could not automatically apply retrospectively. Because the technical character of the goods was central, samples were to be examined by WPC and the matter was to be decided again on fresh adjudication after technical verification. en-us Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jan 2020 15:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381037 Remand under Customs appellate procedure was treated as permissible where the earlier order had been set aside for want of proper hearing and further adjudication was needed. On the wireless access point issue, the text notes that importability depended on whether WPC permission was required at the relevant time, and that later clarification could not automatically apply retrospectively. Because the technical character of the goods was central, samples were to be examined by WPC and the matter was to be decided again on fresh adjudication after technical verification. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381037