<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 109 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381032</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants regarding the demand of Service Tax on Franchisee Service, Management Maintenance &amp;amp; Repair Service, and Manpower Recruitment or Supply Services. However, the demand under Management Consultancy Services and Commercial Coaching and Training Services was upheld. The demand of CENVAT Credit disallowed for non-production of documents was remanded back to the Commissioner for further review. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner to redetermine the penalty after considering the remand proceedings and upheld demands. The matter was remanded back to the Commissioner for a decision within four months with proper hearing opportunities for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 109 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381032</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants regarding the demand of Service Tax on Franchisee Service, Management Maintenance &amp;amp; Repair Service, and Manpower Recruitment or Supply Services. However, the demand under Management Consultancy Services and Commercial Coaching and Training Services was upheld. The demand of CENVAT Credit disallowed for non-production of documents was remanded back to the Commissioner for further review. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner to redetermine the penalty after considering the remand proceedings and upheld demands. The matter was remanded back to the Commissioner for a decision within four months with proper hearing opportunities for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>