https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281093 The ITAT Chandigarh ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeals and dismissing the departmental appeal. The judgments were pronounced in open court, upholding the relief granted by the CIT(A) and the ITAT's decision based on consistent legal positions and factual considerations. The disallowance of interest on investments under section 36(1)(iii) and the addition made on account of disallowance under section 14A were both overturned in favor of the assessee. en-us Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Jun 2019 20:13:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281093 The ITAT Chandigarh ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeals and dismissing the departmental appeal. The judgments were pronounced in open court, upholding the relief granted by the CIT(A) and the ITAT's decision based on consistent legal positions and factual considerations. The disallowance of interest on investments under section 36(1)(iii) and the addition made on account of disallowance under section 14A were both overturned in favor of the assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281093