<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1679 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281091</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalties imposed under section 271AAA for AY 2012-13 and section 271(1)(c) for AY 2007-08. The penalties were found to be unjust as the income disclosed voluntarily was not attributable to the relevant assessment years, and there was a discrepancy in the legal grounds for initiating and imposing penalties. The assessees&#039; appeals were successful, and the penalties were directed to be deleted due to the lack of proper application of the law by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 20:13:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1679 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281091</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalties imposed under section 271AAA for AY 2012-13 and section 271(1)(c) for AY 2007-08. The penalties were found to be unjust as the income disclosed voluntarily was not attributable to the relevant assessment years, and there was a discrepancy in the legal grounds for initiating and imposing penalties. The assessees&#039; appeals were successful, and the penalties were directed to be deleted due to the lack of proper application of the law by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>