<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1784 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281089</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was unsustainable as the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to initiate penalty proceedings based on documents from a different assessment year. The Tribunal emphasized the independence of penalty and assessment proceedings, setting aside the penalty imposed on the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 20:13:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1784 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281089</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was unsustainable as the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to initiate penalty proceedings based on documents from a different assessment year. The Tribunal emphasized the independence of penalty and assessment proceedings, setting aside the penalty imposed on the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>