<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 3 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18380</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The Court held that the assessee qualified as an &quot;industrial company&quot; under section 2(7)(c) of the Finance Act, 1978, based on its manufacturing activities involving the sale of manufactured goods and fabrication of trusses. The Court emphasized that the income attribution criteria did not negate the assessee&#039;s classification as an industrial company, as long as the primary activities involved manufacturing. The Court distinguished a previous Supreme Court judgment and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings, supporting the assessee&#039;s status as an industrial company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:21:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 3 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18380</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The Court held that the assessee qualified as an &quot;industrial company&quot; under section 2(7)(c) of the Finance Act, 1978, based on its manufacturing activities involving the sale of manufactured goods and fabrication of trusses. The Court emphasized that the income attribution criteria did not negate the assessee&#039;s classification as an industrial company, as long as the primary activities involved manufacturing. The Court distinguished a previous Supreme Court judgment and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings, supporting the assessee&#039;s status as an industrial company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>