<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1983 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281096</link>
    <description>A legally valid assignment of financial debt, supported by a deed of assignment and consideration, is described as sufficient to confer financial creditor status under the insolvency framework. The text notes rejection of objections based on RBI guidelines, exclusion of the SBLC from the transfer, alleged contractual breach, and the argument that only NPAs can be assigned, because the transfer of the loan itself was not invalidated and borrower consent was not required. It further states that default was treated as established through the statement of dues and supporting certificate, that the application was complete, and that no disciplinary proceeding was pending against the proposed resolution professional, leading to admission and initiation of CIRP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 20:13:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1983 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281096</link>
      <description>A legally valid assignment of financial debt, supported by a deed of assignment and consideration, is described as sufficient to confer financial creditor status under the insolvency framework. The text notes rejection of objections based on RBI guidelines, exclusion of the SBLC from the transfer, alleged contractual breach, and the argument that only NPAs can be assigned, because the transfer of the loan itself was not invalidated and borrower consent was not required. It further states that default was treated as established through the statement of dues and supporting certificate, that the application was complete, and that no disciplinary proceeding was pending against the proposed resolution professional, leading to admission and initiation of CIRP.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>