https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380999 Service of a demand notice under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was treated as valid when delivered at the corporate office, not only the registered office, for purposes of a section 9 application. The Tribunal noted the contrary objection that non-service at the registered office rendered the application defective, but followed the later appellate view that service at either office is sufficient. On that basis, receipt of the notice and response by the corporate debtor supported valid service, and the maintainability objection based on place of service was rejected. en-us Sun, 10 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Jun 2019 15:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380999 Service of a demand notice under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was treated as valid when delivered at the corporate office, not only the registered office, for purposes of a section 9 application. The Tribunal noted the contrary objection that non-service at the registered office rendered the application defective, but followed the later appellate view that service at either office is sufficient. On that basis, receipt of the notice and response by the corporate debtor supported valid service, and the maintainability objection based on place of service was rejected. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Sun, 10 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380999