https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380995 The case involved a challenge against an order confirming the demand of wrongly availed Cenvat Credit by the Appellant. The Appellant contended that they had already reversed the credit before the notice was issued, which was not considered. The Tribunal directed a remand to verify the proportionate reversal of credit, emphasizing the importance of proper procedures. The decision highlighted the need for a fair opportunity of hearing and adherence to Cenvat Credit rules. The Appeal was allowed for a reevaluation of the proportionate reversal, indicating a procedural flaw in the original decision. en-us Wed, 29 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Jun 2019 09:39:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380995 The case involved a challenge against an order confirming the demand of wrongly availed Cenvat Credit by the Appellant. The Appellant contended that they had already reversed the credit before the notice was issued, which was not considered. The Tribunal directed a remand to verify the proportionate reversal of credit, emphasizing the importance of proper procedures. The decision highlighted the need for a fair opportunity of hearing and adherence to Cenvat Credit rules. The Appeal was allowed for a reevaluation of the proportionate reversal, indicating a procedural flaw in the original decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 29 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380995