<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 70 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380993</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, allowing Cenvat credit for the rent-a-cab service used to provide car service to guests. The decision was based on the interpretation that motor vehicles are considered capital goods for the service provider, entitling the Appellant to the credit. The impugned order was set aside, and the Appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 09:39:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 70 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380993</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, allowing Cenvat credit for the rent-a-cab service used to provide car service to guests. The decision was based on the interpretation that motor vehicles are considered capital goods for the service provider, entitling the Appellant to the credit. The impugned order was set aside, and the Appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>