<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 66 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380989</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the denial of Cenvat credit on the Medi-claim Policy for employees and Group Personal Accident Insurance Policy amounting to Rs. 8,37,191. The penalty of Rs. 83,000 imposed under Rule 15(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was set aside. The appellant was held liable to pay the denied amount, but the penalty was deemed unjustified due to the interpretative nature of the issue. The appeal was dismissed, and the decision was pronounced on 31/05/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 09:38:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 66 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380989</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the denial of Cenvat credit on the Medi-claim Policy for employees and Group Personal Accident Insurance Policy amounting to Rs. 8,37,191. The penalty of Rs. 83,000 imposed under Rule 15(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was set aside. The appellant was held liable to pay the denied amount, but the penalty was deemed unjustified due to the interpretative nature of the issue. The appeal was dismissed, and the decision was pronounced on 31/05/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>