https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380985 Where a statutory appellate remedy is available under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, writ interference under Articles 226 and 227 is ordinarily declined, and objections including procedural defects should be raised in appeal. Because the assessee received notice, sought time, and produced books of account before the assessing authority, the reassessment was made after participation in the proceedings, so the plea of denial of natural justice was not accepted. The writ petition was therefore dismissed and the assessee was relegated to the First Appellate Authority. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Jun 2019 18:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380985 Where a statutory appellate remedy is available under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, writ interference under Articles 226 and 227 is ordinarily declined, and objections including procedural defects should be raised in appeal. Because the assessee received notice, sought time, and produced books of account before the assessing authority, the reassessment was made after participation in the proceedings, so the plea of denial of natural justice was not accepted. The writ petition was therefore dismissed and the assessee was relegated to the First Appellate Authority. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380985