<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1302 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281074</link>
    <description>A profession carried on through personal skill and intelligence is distinct from a commercial activity, and a private medical practice does not, by that character alone, become a commercial establishment. Applying that settled distinction, the Bombay HC held that the amendment to Section 2(4) of the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948, could not validly bring medical practitioners within the definition of &quot;commercial establishment&quot;. The amendment was therefore unconstitutional to that extent and was struck down.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 20:22:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1302 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281074</link>
      <description>A profession carried on through personal skill and intelligence is distinct from a commercial activity, and a private medical practice does not, by that character alone, become a commercial establishment. Applying that settled distinction, the Bombay HC held that the amendment to Section 2(4) of the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948, could not validly bring medical practitioners within the definition of &quot;commercial establishment&quot;. The amendment was therefore unconstitutional to that extent and was struck down.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>