<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1894 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281070</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for restoration of the appeal under Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. The appellant had voluntarily withdrawn the appeal, believing the issue would be resolved by the Department. Subsequently, the Department filed an appeal against the remanded order. The Tribunal held that the withdrawal was voluntary and could not be reinstated, especially as the Commissioner had remanded the matter back to the original authority, providing the appellant with an opportunity to present their case. Therefore, the Tribunal found no grounds to restore the appeal and dismissed the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 20:22:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1894 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281070</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for restoration of the appeal under Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. The appellant had voluntarily withdrawn the appeal, believing the issue would be resolved by the Department. Subsequently, the Department filed an appeal against the remanded order. The Tribunal held that the withdrawal was voluntary and could not be reinstated, especially as the Commissioner had remanded the matter back to the original authority, providing the appellant with an opportunity to present their case. Therefore, the Tribunal found no grounds to restore the appeal and dismissed the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>