<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1678 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281077</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad found that the prohibition order was issued without following principles of natural justice, as the appellant was not given an opportunity to present their defense. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of upholding natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 20:22:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1678 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281077</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad found that the prohibition order was issued without following principles of natural justice, as the appellant was not given an opportunity to present their defense. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of upholding natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>