<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 76 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18365</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee partnership firm engaged in dam construction in a case involving the classification of dumpers, allowance of additional depreciation for dumpers, eligibility for deduction under section 32A, and depreciation rate for temporary structures at construction sites. The Court held that dumpers were not road transport vehicles, qualified for 30% depreciation as earthmoving machinery, and were entitled to the deduction under section 32A. However, the Court sided with the Revenue on the depreciation rate for temporary structures, allowing only 7.5% instead of the claimed 20%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:52:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 76 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18365</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee partnership firm engaged in dam construction in a case involving the classification of dumpers, allowance of additional depreciation for dumpers, eligibility for deduction under section 32A, and depreciation rate for temporary structures at construction sites. The Court held that dumpers were not road transport vehicles, qualified for 30% depreciation as earthmoving machinery, and were entitled to the deduction under section 32A. However, the Court sided with the Revenue on the depreciation rate for temporary structures, allowing only 7.5% instead of the claimed 20%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>