https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281060 Judicial or quasi-judicial interference with a duly constituted Selection Committee's assessment of candidates is limited to cases of illegality, patent irregularity, or mala fides, and does not extend to re-appreciation of comparative merit or suitability for appointment. The Tribunal exceeded that limited review by independently judging the candidates' relative merits as though sitting in appeal over the Selection Committee, without identifying any other defect in the selection process. On that basis, the interference was held unsustainable and the selection could not be quashed on comparative merit alone; the matter was remitted for fresh disposal on the remaining issues in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 11 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Jun 2019 16:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281060 Judicial or quasi-judicial interference with a duly constituted Selection Committee's assessment of candidates is limited to cases of illegality, patent irregularity, or mala fides, and does not extend to re-appreciation of comparative merit or suitability for appointment. The Tribunal exceeded that limited review by independently judging the candidates' relative merits as though sitting in appeal over the Selection Committee, without identifying any other defect in the selection process. On that basis, the interference was held unsustainable and the selection could not be quashed on comparative merit alone; the matter was remitted for fresh disposal on the remaining issues in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281060