<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 52 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380975</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the search and seizure conducted by the respondents to be impermissible under the guise of a survey operation. The court emphasized the lack of material evidence of non-cooperation by the petitioner, the absence of recorded reasons for suspicion, and the vague nature of the summons issued. As a result, the court deemed the respondents&#039; actions legally unsustainable, quashing the search and seizure and providing consequential benefits to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 52 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380975</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the search and seizure conducted by the respondents to be impermissible under the guise of a survey operation. The court emphasized the lack of material evidence of non-cooperation by the petitioner, the absence of recorded reasons for suspicion, and the vague nature of the summons issued. As a result, the court deemed the respondents&#039; actions legally unsustainable, quashing the search and seizure and providing consequential benefits to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>