<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty Quashed Due to Discrepancy Between Charge Explained and Actual Levy u/s 27(1)(c) for Income Concealment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46895</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 27(1)(c) - addition u/s 68/69 for cash deposit in bank account - penalty has been initiated on the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars, but Ld.AO levied penalty on concealment of income - assessee was asked to explain penalty on one count whereas levy has been on other count - itself sufficient for quashing of penalty</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 07:56:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 07:56:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty Quashed Due to Discrepancy Between Charge Explained and Actual Levy u/s 27(1)(c) for Income Concealment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46895</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 27(1)(c) - addition u/s 68/69 for cash deposit in bank account - penalty has been initiated on the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars, but Ld.AO levied penalty on concealment of income - assessee was asked to explain penalty on one count whereas levy has been on other count - itself sufficient for quashing of penalty</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 07:56:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>