<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 24 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380947</link>
    <description>Renewal of a Customs Broker licence cannot be rejected on the basis of pending criminal proceedings or alleged non-disclosure where those facts were already on record and within the department&#039;s knowledge. A prior communication had already indicated renewal for a further period, and production of the original licence for endorsement was only a formal step. On that footing, the later rejection could not be justified by relying on pre-existing matters from the earlier dispute, and the refusal of renewal was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 24 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380947</link>
      <description>Renewal of a Customs Broker licence cannot be rejected on the basis of pending criminal proceedings or alleged non-disclosure where those facts were already on record and within the department&#039;s knowledge. A prior communication had already indicated renewal for a further period, and production of the original licence for endorsement was only a formal step. On that footing, the later rejection could not be justified by relying on pre-existing matters from the earlier dispute, and the refusal of renewal was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>