<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 18 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380941</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that their activities did not fall under the taxable category of Survey and Exploration of Mineral Services, entitling them to a refund. The rejection of the refund claim based on time bar was deemed unjustified. However, the issue of unjust enrichment required further evaluation. The matter was remanded for reconsideration on the unjust enrichment aspect, giving the appellant an opportunity to provide evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 07:53:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 18 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380941</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that their activities did not fall under the taxable category of Survey and Exploration of Mineral Services, entitling them to a refund. The rejection of the refund claim based on time bar was deemed unjustified. However, the issue of unjust enrichment required further evaluation. The matter was remanded for reconsideration on the unjust enrichment aspect, giving the appellant an opportunity to provide evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>