https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380939 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for service tax on renting of immovable property services. It found the appellant and her husband to be joint owners of the property, rejecting the Department's claim based on land revenue records. The Tribunal also agreed with the appellant's argument regarding separate consideration of rental income sharing between co-owners for service tax calculation. The matter was remanded to verify if the rental income fell within the threshold limit for service tax liability during the disputed period. en-us Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380939 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for service tax on renting of immovable property services. It found the appellant and her husband to be joint owners of the property, rejecting the Department's claim based on land revenue records. The Tribunal also agreed with the appellant's argument regarding separate consideration of rental income sharing between co-owners for service tax calculation. The matter was remanded to verify if the rental income fell within the threshold limit for service tax liability during the disputed period. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380939