<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 8 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380931</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as non-maintainable under the National Litigation Policy. The Tribunal ruled that since there was no demand for duty, there was no default in payment, resulting in the rejection of the interest claimed by the Revenue. The dropping of interest under the 3rd proviso to Rule 9 and the applicability of abatement under Rule 10 were also considered moot due to the absence of any outstanding duty payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 07:53:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 8 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380931</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as non-maintainable under the National Litigation Policy. The Tribunal ruled that since there was no demand for duty, there was no default in payment, resulting in the rejection of the interest claimed by the Revenue. The dropping of interest under the 3rd proviso to Rule 9 and the applicability of abatement under Rule 10 were also considered moot due to the absence of any outstanding duty payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>