https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380928 The appeal filed by M/s. Agarwal Pipes was partly allowed by setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, imposed on Shri V. Satish, was also set aside due to non-compliance with statutory requirements for serving the order. The appeals were disposed of accordingly on 22.03.2019. en-us Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 May 2019 17:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380928 The appeal filed by M/s. Agarwal Pipes was partly allowed by setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, imposed on Shri V. Satish, was also set aside due to non-compliance with statutory requirements for serving the order. The appeals were disposed of accordingly on 22.03.2019. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380928