<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1301 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281038</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s decision to disallow 25% of unverifiable expenses claimed by the assessee for the assessment year 2008-09, amounting to Rs. 75,91,967. The Tribunal found the allocation of expenses between the assessee and India Infoline Ltd. was estimated without proper verification, leading to the reinstatement of the AO&#039;s order and allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The deletion of the addition by the Ld. CIT(A) was deemed erroneous as the expenses were not adequately supported with sufficient details.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 07:20:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1301 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281038</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s decision to disallow 25% of unverifiable expenses claimed by the assessee for the assessment year 2008-09, amounting to Rs. 75,91,967. The Tribunal found the allocation of expenses between the assessee and India Infoline Ltd. was estimated without proper verification, leading to the reinstatement of the AO&#039;s order and allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The deletion of the addition by the Ld. CIT(A) was deemed erroneous as the expenses were not adequately supported with sufficient details.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>