<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 15 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18350</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the advance made to a film production company was not allowable as a business loss for the assessee. The court determined that the advance was made to acquire distribution rights, constituting a capital asset rather than a revenue loss incurred in the course of business. Emphasizing the distinction between revenue and capital losses, the court ruled in favor of the Department, denying the allowance of the advance amount as a business loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:07:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 15 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18350</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the advance made to a film production company was not allowable as a business loss for the assessee. The court determined that the advance was made to acquire distribution rights, constituting a capital asset rather than a revenue loss incurred in the course of business. Emphasizing the distinction between revenue and capital losses, the court ruled in favor of the Department, denying the allowance of the advance amount as a business loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>