<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 410 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281032</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the suit&#039;s maintainability challenging the election of office-bearers of a registered society in a civil court. It emphasized that civil court jurisdiction should not be excluded unless expressly indicated by law. The Court clarified that the relief sought fell within the Civil Procedure Code&#039;s scope and directed expedited trial proceedings due to the election&#039;s annual nature. The appeal was dismissed without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 17:44:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 410 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281032</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the suit&#039;s maintainability challenging the election of office-bearers of a registered society in a civil court. It emphasized that civil court jurisdiction should not be excluded unless expressly indicated by law. The Court clarified that the relief sought fell within the Civil Procedure Code&#039;s scope and directed expedited trial proceedings due to the election&#039;s annual nature. The appeal was dismissed without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>