https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281029 Article 137 of the Limitation Act was considered in relation to an application under Section 50 of the Copyright Act, where no specific limitation period is prescribed. The Gujarat HC noted that the Copyright Board is treated as a civil court only for limited purposes expressly set out in the Copyright Act, and that its civil-court-like powers under Section 74 are confined to those express instances. On that basis, the residuary limitation provision in Article 137 was not applied to the Board in the circumstances considered, and no jurisdictional error was found in entertaining the rectification application. en-us Fri, 05 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 May 2019 16:44:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281029 Article 137 of the Limitation Act was considered in relation to an application under Section 50 of the Copyright Act, where no specific limitation period is prescribed. The Gujarat HC noted that the Copyright Board is treated as a civil court only for limited purposes expressly set out in the Copyright Act, and that its civil-court-like powers under Section 74 are confined to those express instances. On that basis, the residuary limitation provision in Article 137 was not applied to the Board in the circumstances considered, and no jurisdictional error was found in entertaining the rectification application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281029