https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281029 The Court upheld the Copyright Board's decision that Article 137 of the Limitation Act does not apply to applications under Section 50 of the Copyright Act, emphasizing the Copyright Board's discretion in entertaining applications and the need for condonation of delay. The Court also ruled that the appeal under Section 72 of the Copyright Act was not maintainable as the Copyright Board's order was not final and fell outside the scope of Section 72. The Court highlighted the quasi-judicial nature of the Copyright Board and the importance of allowing parties a fair chance to present their case. en-us Fri, 05 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 May 2019 16:44:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281029 The Court upheld the Copyright Board's decision that Article 137 of the Limitation Act does not apply to applications under Section 50 of the Copyright Act, emphasizing the Copyright Board's discretion in entertaining applications and the need for condonation of delay. The Court also ruled that the appeal under Section 72 of the Copyright Act was not maintainable as the Copyright Board's order was not final and fell outside the scope of Section 72. The Court highlighted the quasi-judicial nature of the Copyright Board and the importance of allowing parties a fair chance to present their case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281029