https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281026 The Supreme Court held that the Special Court and Tribunal under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982, have jurisdiction to determine questions of adverse possession. The decision in Konda Lakshmana Bapuji was upheld, affirming the Special Court's authority in such matters, while the conflicting decision in N. Srinivasa Rao was overruled. The case was remitted for further consideration on its merits. en-us Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 May 2019 15:49:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281026 The Supreme Court held that the Special Court and Tribunal under the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982, have jurisdiction to determine questions of adverse possession. The decision in Konda Lakshmana Bapuji was upheld, affirming the Special Court's authority in such matters, while the conflicting decision in N. Srinivasa Rao was overruled. The case was remitted for further consideration on its merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281026