https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281023 Order XXI Rule 1(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was treated as applicable to execution of a Motor Vehicles Act award in Haryana because the relevant tribunal rules had adopted the corresponding civil procedure framework, including the amendment introducing that provision. The Court also applied the underlying procedural principle that a deposit of the decretal amount without notice to the decree holder does not amount to effective payment. As a result, interest continued to run until notice of deposit reached the decree holders, and the award of further interest was sustained. en-us Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 May 2019 15:07:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281023 Order XXI Rule 1(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was treated as applicable to execution of a Motor Vehicles Act award in Haryana because the relevant tribunal rules had adopted the corresponding civil procedure framework, including the amendment introducing that provision. The Court also applied the underlying procedural principle that a deposit of the decretal amount without notice to the decree holder does not amount to effective payment. As a result, interest continued to run until notice of deposit reached the decree holders, and the award of further interest was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281023