https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281020 The Supreme Court held that the Tribunal under the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983, qualifies as a "Court" under the Indian Evidence Act. Therefore, Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, is applicable to revision applications under Section 19 of the Act, permitting the condonation of delays. The decision in a previous case was deemed incorrect, leading to a referral to a larger Bench for final resolution. en-us Mon, 12 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 May 2019 14:31:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281020 The Supreme Court held that the Tribunal under the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983, qualifies as a "Court" under the Indian Evidence Act. Therefore, Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, is applicable to revision applications under Section 19 of the Act, permitting the condonation of delays. The decision in a previous case was deemed incorrect, leading to a referral to a larger Bench for final resolution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281020