https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18342 A writ challenge to a proposed sale proclamation was held not maintainable because the petitioners had adequate alternative remedies under the tax recovery process. They had already objected on the basis that the property was separate property and not that of the Hindu undivided family assessee, and the Court noted that objections could be raised before the Tax Recovery Officer and, after sale, a claim petition could be pursued before confirmation of sale. In view of those remedies, writ jurisdiction was declined and the petition was dismissed. en-us Wed, 15 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:49:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18342 A writ challenge to a proposed sale proclamation was held not maintainable because the petitioners had adequate alternative remedies under the tax recovery process. They had already objected on the basis that the property was separate property and not that of the Hindu undivided family assessee, and the Court noted that objections could be raised before the Tax Recovery Officer and, after sale, a claim petition could be pursued before confirmation of sale. In view of those remedies, writ jurisdiction was declined and the petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 15 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18342