<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 729 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281015</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court note states that the University and College Tribunal under the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 can examine only the jurisdictional fact of whether an institution is affiliated or recognised, but cannot inquire into the legality or validity of affiliation itself. Questions on grant or withdrawal of affiliation remain within the University&#039;s statutory domain. It further states that where the college was in fact affiliated and had NCTE recognition for the relevant year, the employees&#039; termination appeals were maintainable before the Tribunal, and the dispute had to be decided on merits within its limited jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 11:33:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 729 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281015</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court note states that the University and College Tribunal under the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 can examine only the jurisdictional fact of whether an institution is affiliated or recognised, but cannot inquire into the legality or validity of affiliation itself. Questions on grant or withdrawal of affiliation remain within the University&#039;s statutory domain. It further states that where the college was in fact affiliated and had NCTE recognition for the relevant year, the employees&#039; termination appeals were maintainable before the Tribunal, and the dispute had to be decided on merits within its limited jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>