<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 368 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281014</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the civil appeals were dismissed on facts only. The Supreme Court did not record any broader legal ruling on the central excise dispute, indicating that the outcome turned on the factual matrix rather than a point of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 368 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281014</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the civil appeals were dismissed on facts only. The Supreme Court did not record any broader legal ruling on the central excise dispute, indicating that the outcome turned on the factual matrix rather than a point of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>