<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1631 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380903</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant the refund benefit denied by the original Authority. The Tribunal held that certain services qualified as input services eligible for refund under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, including Air Travel Agent Service, Membership of Club or Association Service, Rent-a-Cab Service. Additionally, the denial of refund for Renting of Immovable Property Service was deemed unjustified as the service provider had paid service tax on electricity charges. The Tribunal found the debit notes compliant with the Service Tax Rules, 1994, and ruled in favor of the appellant, providing the consequential benefit of refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 09:19:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1631 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380903</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant the refund benefit denied by the original Authority. The Tribunal held that certain services qualified as input services eligible for refund under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, including Air Travel Agent Service, Membership of Club or Association Service, Rent-a-Cab Service. Additionally, the denial of refund for Renting of Immovable Property Service was deemed unjustified as the service provider had paid service tax on electricity charges. The Tribunal found the debit notes compliant with the Service Tax Rules, 1994, and ruled in favor of the appellant, providing the consequential benefit of refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>