<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1624 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380896</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the refund claims, emphasizing the applicability of exemptions to imported goods and the revised refund provisions post the 2011 amendment to Section 27 of the Customs Act. The impugned Order-in-Appeal was deemed legally sound, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2020 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1624 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380896</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the refund claims, emphasizing the applicability of exemptions to imported goods and the revised refund provisions post the 2011 amendment to Section 27 of the Customs Act. The impugned Order-in-Appeal was deemed legally sound, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>