https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380895 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Order-in-Original as barred by limitation, despite the appellant's argument of delayed receipt due to a wrong address. The Tribunal noted the appellant's negligence in responding to notices and emphasized the significance of adhering to time limits and considering malafide or negligence in such cases. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, highlighting the importance of timely responses and compliance with procedural laws, particularly in cases involving negligence or deliberate ignorance. en-us Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380895 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Order-in-Original as barred by limitation, despite the appellant's argument of delayed receipt due to a wrong address. The Tribunal noted the appellant's negligence in responding to notices and emphasized the significance of adhering to time limits and considering malafide or negligence in such cases. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, highlighting the importance of timely responses and compliance with procedural laws, particularly in cases involving negligence or deliberate ignorance. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380895