https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380886 The Tribunal allowed the appellant, a manufacturer of Aluminium, to avail cenvat credit on supplementary invoices issued by subsidiary companies, despite allegations of additional consideration. Citing previous decisions and the absence of fraud or suppression, the Tribunal granted the appellant entitlement to the cenvat credit, setting aside the disallowance and recovery demand. The appeal was allowed based on the recurring nature of the issue and alignment with previous decisions, affirming the appellant's right to claim cenvat credit on the disputed invoices. en-us Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 May 2019 09:08:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380886 The Tribunal allowed the appellant, a manufacturer of Aluminium, to avail cenvat credit on supplementary invoices issued by subsidiary companies, despite allegations of additional consideration. Citing previous decisions and the absence of fraud or suppression, the Tribunal granted the appellant entitlement to the cenvat credit, setting aside the disallowance and recovery demand. The appeal was allowed based on the recurring nature of the issue and alignment with previous decisions, affirming the appellant's right to claim cenvat credit on the disputed invoices. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380886