<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1815 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281012</link>
    <description>Where excise duty itself stood exempted from levy, Education Cess and Secondary &amp; Higher Education Cess collected along with such duty were treated as refundable. The High Court disposed of the petition on the basis of the consensus recorded before it, noting the Supreme Court&#039;s connected-line ruling supporting refund in such situations. The respondents accepted the refund claim in the proceeding, and refund of the cesses was directed to be made within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 09:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1815 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281012</link>
      <description>Where excise duty itself stood exempted from levy, Education Cess and Secondary &amp; Higher Education Cess collected along with such duty were treated as refundable. The High Court disposed of the petition on the basis of the consensus recorded before it, noting the Supreme Court&#039;s connected-line ruling supporting refund in such situations. The respondents accepted the refund claim in the proceeding, and refund of the cesses was directed to be made within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>