<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1607 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380879</link>
    <description>The Respondent was found to have profiteered by not passing on the Input Tax Credit (ITC) benefit to home buyers post-GST implementation. The Authority ordered the Respondent to refund the profiteered amount of Rs. 19,69,991 with interest to affected buyers. Further investigation was directed for additional flats sold. The penalty imposition was deferred pending a specific notice outlining the allegations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2019 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=573257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1607 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380879</link>
      <description>The Respondent was found to have profiteered by not passing on the Input Tax Credit (ITC) benefit to home buyers post-GST implementation. The Authority ordered the Respondent to refund the profiteered amount of Rs. 19,69,991 with interest to affected buyers. Further investigation was directed for additional flats sold. The penalty imposition was deferred pending a specific notice outlining the allegations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=380879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>